Vernacular Evolution: A Comparative Study of Language Use in Generation Z and Generation Alpha on Social Media
Abstract
The rapid growth of technology, accompanied by the accessibility of social media, has slowly shaped how newer generations interact. This study explores the differences in language use between Generation Z and Generation Alpha on social media, focusing on how technology and modern social contexts shape their communication. A mixed-methods approach was used, combining quantitative data from structured questionnaires distributed to 50 respondents with qualitative analyses of social media behavior. The research examined four key elements of vernacular language: memes, slang, emojis, and abbreviations. Results show that both generations frequently use these elements, but with distinct differences. Generation Z tends to have a deeper understanding of meme culture and slang, often referencing current trends and cultural moments. In contrast, Generation Alpha prefers simpler meme formats and uses slang in more limited ways. Both groups widely use emojis but serve different purposes: Generation Z uses them contextually to add emotional depth, while Generation Alpha uses them more freely as standalone expressions. Abbreviations are also common, with Generation Z creating new acronyms and Generation Alpha relying on established ones. Peer influence and social media trends play a significant role in the adoption of these vernacular forms, reflecting their digital upbringing and group identity.
References
Alieva Khabibullaevna, N., & Nurjakhon Ilkhomjon kizi, O. (2023). UNVEILING THE LABYRINTH OF INTERNET PHRASEOLOGY: NAVIGATING THE LINGUISTIC LANDSCAPE OF THE DIGITAL ERA. QO ‘QON UNIVERSITETI XABARNOMASI, 7. https://doi.org/10.54613/ku.v7i7.784
Alshenqeeti, H. (2016). Are Emojis Creating a New or Old Visual Language for New Generations? A Socio-semiotic Study. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(6). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.6p.56
Azad, I. (2023). How do different generations communicate on social media? a comparative analysis of language styles, emoji usage, and visual elements. Language.Tech.Soc.Med, 1(2), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.70211/ltsm.v1i2.61
Biró, E. (2020). Linguistic Identities in the Digital Space. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.2478/ausp-2019-0011
Conny, C. (2024). Linguistic shift among gen z in computer-mediated communication. English Review Journal of English Education, 12(3), 959–970. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v12i3.10414
Denis, D., Gardner, M. H., Brook, M., & Tagliamonte, S. A. (2019). Peaks and arrowheads of vernacular reorganization. In Language Variation and Change (Vol. 31, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1017/S095439451900005X
Dewi, Y. fourina, Susilawati, & Saputra, G. W. (2024). The Effect of Enforcement Of Mayor Regulation No. 888 Of 2012 On Street Vendors’ Compliance (PKL) In Bandung Kulon Distric. Pasundan Social Science Development (PASCIDEV), 5(1), 95–103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56457/pascidev.v5i1.191
Duffett, R. G., & Maraule, M. (2024). Customer engagement and intention to purchase attitudes of generation Z consumers toward emojis in digital marketing communications. Young Consumers, 25(5). https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-08-2023-1817
Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1992). Think Practically and Look Locally: Language and Gender as Community-Based Practice. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 461–490. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002333
Herring, S. C. (2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior. In S. A. Barab, R. Kling, & J. H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning (pp. 338–376). Cambridge University Press.
Labov, W. (2006). The social stratification of English in New York city, second edition. In The Social Stratification of English in New York City, Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618208
Ladegaard, H. J., & Bleses, D. (2003). Gender differences in young children’s speech: The acquisition of sociolinguistic competence. International Journal of Applied Linguistics (United Kingdom), 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.00045
Lee, J. S. (2020). Digital communication, social media, and Englishes. World Englishes, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12447
Lin, Z. (2023). How Do Internet Slang and Memes Affect Chinese Teenagers? Communications in Humanities Research, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/21/20231422
Luangrath, A. W., Peck, J., & Barger, V. A. (2017). Textual paralanguage and its implications for marketing communications. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2016.05.002
Mahfouz, I. M. (2018). Word Shortening Strategies: Egyptian vs. Non-Egyptian English Tweets. English Language and Literature Studies, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/ells.v8n3p27
O’sullivan, J., & Kelly-Holmes, H. (2017). Vernacularisation and authenticity in Irish radio advertising. World Englishes, 36(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12258
Petrova, Y. (2021). Meme language, its impact on digital culture and collective thinking. E3S Web of Conferences, 273. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127311026
Rickford, J. R. (2016). Labov’s contributions to the study of African American Vernacular English: Pursuing linguistic and social equity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12198
Saputra, G. W., Dzauharoh, S., Johan, A., Kusumawardana, M. F., & Susilawati. (2023). Socialization for the Formation of Young Generation Discipline. TGO Journal of Community Development, 1(2), 70–76. https://doi.org/10.56070/jcd.2023.012
Suizo, C. (2024). Gen z’s language identity and contemporary philosophies in the digital era. J. Nat. Lang Linguist, 2(1), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.54536/jnll.v2i1.2396
Thorne, S. L., Sauro, S., & Smith, B. (2015). Technologies, identities, and expressive activity. In Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (Vol. 35). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000257
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Iis Kurnia Nurhayati Nurhayati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The International Journal of Language and Cultural Linguistics (IJLCL) and its articles is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.